Pau Darco

Pau D’arco is a powerful antimicrobial herb from the inner bark of South American rainforest trees that contains unique compounds like lapachol and beta-lapachone. Traditional healers have used it for centuries to fight infections, reduce inflammation, support immune function, and maintain overall wellness.

Alternative Names: Tabebuia impetiginosa, Tabebuia avellanedae, Handroanthus impetiginosus, Lapacho, Taheebo, Ipe Roxo, Trumpet Bush

Categories: Antimicrobial, Immunomodulator, Traditional Herb

Primary Longevity Benefits


  • Antimicrobial
  • Anti-inflammatory
  • Antioxidant protection
  • Immune modulation

Secondary Benefits


  • Digestive health
  • Skin health
  • Joint support
  • Detoxification
  • Cellular protection
  • Candida resistance

Mechanism of Action


Pau D’arco (Tabebuia impetiginosa) exerts its therapeutic effects through a diverse array of bioactive compounds, with naphthoquinones being the most well-studied active constituents. These include lapachol, beta-lapachone, and dehydro-alpha-lapachone, along with flavonoids, coumarins, anthraquinones, and various other polyphenols. The antimicrobial properties of Pau D’arco are primarily attributed to its naphthoquinone compounds, particularly lapachol and beta-lapachone. These compounds demonstrate activity against a wide range of microorganisms through multiple mechanisms.

They can intercalate with DNA, disrupting microbial replication processes. Additionally, they generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) within microbial cells, leading to oxidative damage of cellular components including proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids. This ROS generation appears to be selective, affecting microbial cells more than mammalian cells at therapeutic concentrations. For fungal pathogens, particularly Candida species, Pau D’arco compounds disrupt cell wall integrity and inhibit hyphal formation, a crucial virulence factor.

The anti-inflammatory effects of Pau D’arco stem from multiple pathways. Its active compounds inhibit pro-inflammatory enzymes including cyclooxygenase (COX) and 5-lipoxygenase (5-LOX), reducing the production of inflammatory mediators like prostaglandins and leukotrienes. Research has shown that Pau D’arco extracts suppress nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) activation, a master regulator of inflammatory responses, and modulate the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β), and interleukin-6 (IL-6). The antioxidant activity of Pau D’arco involves direct free radical scavenging by its polyphenolic compounds, as well as enhancement of endogenous antioxidant defenses through activation of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), which regulates the expression of antioxidant enzymes.

This dual antioxidant action provides comprehensive protection against oxidative stress. The immune-modulating effects of Pau D’arco are complex and bidirectional. Its compounds enhance macrophage activity and natural killer (NK) cell function, potentially improving surveillance against pathogens and abnormal cells. Simultaneously, it can reduce excessive immune activation in inflammatory conditions, suggesting an adaptogenic-like effect on immune function.

For cellular protection, beta-lapachone has demonstrated the ability to induce phase II detoxification enzymes, enhancing the cell’s ability to neutralize and eliminate potentially harmful compounds. Additionally, certain compounds in Pau D’arco appear to modulate apoptosis (programmed cell death) pathways, potentially eliminating damaged or dysfunctional cells before they can cause harm. In digestive health applications, Pau D’arco’s antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory properties work synergistically to combat pathogenic microorganisms while reducing intestinal inflammation. Some research suggests it may help restore healthy gut microbiota balance, particularly in cases of Candida overgrowth.

For skin health, the antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant properties of Pau D’arco contribute to its traditional use for various skin conditions. Topical application may help reduce skin pathogens, decrease inflammation, and protect against oxidative damage from environmental stressors. The joint support benefits of Pau D’arco stem primarily from its anti-inflammatory mechanisms, potentially reducing joint inflammation and associated pain. Some preliminary research suggests it may also inhibit certain enzymes involved in cartilage degradation, though this requires further investigation.

While Pau D’arco has been traditionally used for various serious health conditions, including cancer, it’s important to note that clinical evidence for such applications remains limited, and its compounds should not be considered a replacement for conventional medical treatment.

Optimal Dosage


Disclaimer: The following dosage information is for educational purposes only. Always consult with a healthcare provider before starting any supplement regimen, especially if you have pre-existing health conditions, are pregnant or nursing, or are taking medications.

1-2 grams of dried inner bark powder taken 2-3 times daily; or 3-6 grams of dried inner bark daily, divided into 2-3 doses. For tea preparation: 1-2 teaspoons (2-4 grams) of bark per cup of water, steeped for 8-10 minutes, consumed 2-3 times daily. For standardized extracts, follow manufacturer recommendations, typically 250-500 mg daily standardized to 3-5% naphthoquinones.

By Condition

Condition Dosage Notes
Candida overgrowth 2 grams dried inner bark powder three times daily; or 1-2 cups of strong tea (2 teaspoons bark per cup) three times daily Often used as part of a comprehensive anti-Candida protocol; may take 4-8 weeks for significant improvement. Best results typically seen when combined with dietary modifications to reduce sugar and refined carbohydrates.
General immune support 1 gram dried inner bark powder twice daily; or 1 cup of tea twice daily For preventative use and general immune enhancement; can be used long-term at this dosage with periodic breaks (e.g., 5 days on, 2 days off).
Inflammatory conditions 1-2 grams dried inner bark powder three times daily; or 500 mg standardized extract twice daily Anti-inflammatory effects develop gradually; may take 2-4 weeks to show significant improvement in symptoms.
Skin conditions (topical use) Strong tea or tincture applied directly to affected areas 2-3 times daily; or commercial creams containing 2-5% Pau D’arco extract Can be used alongside internal administration for enhanced effects; prepare tea double-strength for topical applications.
Digestive issues 1 gram dried inner bark powder before meals; or 1 cup of tea 15-30 minutes before meals Particularly helpful for digestive issues with suspected microbial imbalance component.
Parasitic infections 2 grams dried inner bark powder three times daily for 10-14 days Should be used under healthcare provider supervision for diagnosed parasitic infections; often combined with other antiparasitic herbs.
Joint discomfort 1-2 grams dried inner bark powder twice daily May take 3-4 weeks to notice significant improvement; often combined with other anti-inflammatory herbs.

By Age Group

Age Group Dosage Notes
Adults (18-65 years) 1-2 grams dried inner bark powder 2-3 times daily Standard adult dosage for most applications.
Seniors (65+ years) Start with 1 gram dried inner bark powder twice daily Start with lower doses and gradually increase as tolerated; monitor for potential interactions with medications commonly used in this age group.
Adolescents (13-17 years) 0.5-1 gram dried inner bark powder twice daily Limited research in this age group; use only under healthcare provider supervision.
Children (6-12 years) Not generally recommended Insufficient safety data for this age group; use only under qualified healthcare provider supervision if deemed necessary.
Children under 6 years Not recommended Insufficient safety data for this age group.
Pregnant women Not recommended Traditionally avoided during pregnancy due to potential uterine stimulant effects and insufficient safety data.
Lactating women Not recommended Insufficient safety data for use during breastfeeding.

Bioavailability


Absorption Rate

Low to moderate; the naphthoquinones (including lapachol and beta-lapachone) have limited water solubility and moderate lipid solubility, resulting in variable oral bioavailability. Studies suggest approximately 15-30% bioavailability for lapachol, with significant individual variation. The complex matrix of the inner bark may contain compounds that both enhance and inhibit absorption of active constituents.

Enhancement Methods

Traditional preparation as a decoction (simmered for 15-20 minutes rather than steeped) enhances extraction of naphthoquinones and other active compounds, Combining with black pepper extract (piperine) may increase absorption by inhibiting P-glycoprotein efflux and certain metabolic enzymes, Taking with a fat-containing meal enhances absorption of lipophilic compounds like lapachol and beta-lapachone, Alcohol-based extracts (tinctures) typically provide better extraction and potentially better absorption of naphthoquinones compared to water-based preparations, Liposomal formulations can significantly improve bioavailability by enhancing solubility and cellular uptake, Micronized powder formulations increase surface area, potentially improving dissolution rate and absorption, Standardized extracts with higher naphthoquinone content generally provide better bioavailability than raw bark powder, Some formulations include natural surfactants or emulsifiers to improve solubility and absorption

Timing Recommendations

For antimicrobial and immune-supporting effects, consistent timing throughout the day is more important than specific timing. Taking with meals containing moderate fat content (15-25g fat) enhances absorption of lipophilic compounds, though high-fat meals may delay absorption. For digestive issues, taking 15-30 minutes before meals may provide optimal benefits. The traditional preparation method significantly impacts bioavailability – decoctions (simmered for 15-20 minutes) extract more naphthoquinones than simple infusions.

The inner bark should be finely shredded or powdered to increase surface area for extraction. For Candida and microbial issues, divided dosing (3-4 times daily) may provide more consistent antimicrobial effects throughout the day. The half-life of lapachol is estimated to be 2-3 hours, suggesting that divided dosing is beneficial for maintaining therapeutic levels. Some practitioners recommend cycling usage (e.g., 5 days on, 2 days off) for long-term use to prevent potential adaptation by microorganisms and to give the body periodic breaks.

Due to the bitter taste, Pau D’arco is traditionally combined with cinnamon, orange peel, or other aromatic herbs to improve palatability, which may also affect absorption through various mechanisms.

Safety Profile


Safety Rating i

2Low Safety

Side Effects

  • Gastrointestinal discomfort including nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea (occasional, particularly with higher doses)
  • Dizziness (uncommon)
  • Anemia with prolonged high-dose use (rare, related to anticoagulant effects)
  • Allergic reactions (rare, more common in individuals allergic to plants in the Bignoniaceae family)
  • Headache (uncommon)
  • Increased bleeding time (dose-dependent)
  • Mild anticoagulant effects (dose-dependent)
  • Bitter taste and aftertaste (very common)

Contraindications

  • Pregnancy (potential uterine stimulant effects; traditionally contraindicated)
  • Breastfeeding (insufficient safety data)
  • Bleeding disorders (may exacerbate due to anticoagulant effects)
  • Scheduled surgery (discontinue at least 2 weeks before due to potential effects on blood clotting)
  • Severe liver or kidney disease (insufficient safety data for these populations)
  • Known allergy to plants in the Bignoniaceae family
  • Children under 12 years (insufficient safety data)
  • Autoimmune disorders (theoretical concern due to immune-modulating effects)
  • Individuals taking anticoagulant medications (potential additive effects)

Drug Interactions

  • Anticoagulant and antiplatelet drugs (potential additive effects on blood clotting)
  • Immunosuppressant medications (potential interference with therapeutic effects due to immune-modulating properties)
  • Iron supplements and iron-rich foods (may reduce iron absorption if taken simultaneously)
  • Medications metabolized by cytochrome P450 enzymes (potential alteration of drug metabolism)
  • Antidiabetic medications (may enhance hypoglycemic effects, requiring monitoring of blood glucose levels)
  • Chemotherapy drugs (theoretical interactions; should be avoided during conventional cancer treatment unless approved by oncologist)

Upper Limit

No established upper limit; traditional usage suggests not exceeding 8-10 grams of dried inner bark daily for extended periods. Higher doses substantially increase the risk of gastrointestinal side effects and anticoagulant effects. Long-term safety data beyond 3 months of continuous use is limited. Some practitioners recommend periodic breaks (e.g., 5 days on, 2 days off) for long-term administration.

Pure lapachol, one of the active compounds, has demonstrated toxicity at high doses in animal studies and should not be used in isolated form. The whole herb appears to have a better safety profile than isolated compounds, possibly due to the presence of balancing constituents.

Regulatory Status


Fda Status

Pau D’arco (Tabebuia impetiginosa) is regulated as a dietary supplement in the United States. It has not been approved as a drug for any specific health conditions. As with other dietary supplements, the FDA does not review Pau D’arco products for safety or efficacy before they are marketed. Manufacturers are responsible for ensuring their products are safe before marketing and that product labels are truthful and not misleading.

In the 1970s and 1980s, the FDA took action against companies making specific disease claims for Pau D’arco, particularly regarding cancer treatment. Currently, Pau D’arco products cannot legally make claims to treat, cure, or prevent any disease, though structure/function claims (e.g., ‘supports immune health’) are permitted with appropriate disclaimer language.

International Status

Eu: In the European Union, Tabebuia species are not included in the list of approved novel foods. The regulatory status varies by member state, with some countries allowing it as a traditional herbal medicinal product when meeting specific requirements. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has not issued specific monographs on Tabebuia species. In Germany, it is not included in the Commission E approved herbs.

Canada: Health Canada has listed Tabebuia species in the Natural Health Products Ingredients Database with a medicinal ingredient role. It is allowed for use in Natural Health Products with appropriate claims related to traditional use. Products must meet specific quality and labeling requirements. Health Canada has not issued specific monographs or guidance on Pau D’arco for specific health conditions.

Australia: The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) permits Tabebuia species in listed complementary medicines (AUST L). Specific therapeutic claims must be supported by evidence of traditional use. The TGA has not issued specific guidance on Pau D’arco.

Brazil: In Brazil, where Pau D’arco is native, it is recognized in the Brazilian Pharmacopoeia and is regulated as a traditional herbal medicine. The Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (ANVISA) permits its use in various formulations with appropriate labeling. It is included in Brazil’s National List of Medicinal Plants of Interest to the Unified Health System (RENISUS).

Argentina: The Argentine food code (Código Alimentario Argentino) recognizes Tabebuia impetiginosa as a medicinal herb that can be used in herbal teas and supplements. It is regulated by the National Administration of Drugs, Foods and Medical Devices (ANMAT).

Who: The World Health Organization (WHO) has not issued specific monographs on Pau D’arco, though it acknowledges the traditional use of this plant in various South American traditional medicine systems.

Synergistic Compounds


Compound Synergy Mechanism Evidence Rating
Oregano Oil (Origanum vulgare) Complementary antimicrobial effects against Candida and other pathogens; oregano’s carvacrol and thymol work through different mechanisms than Pau D’arco’s naphthoquinones 2
Garlic (Allium sativum) Enhanced antimicrobial effects; garlic’s allicin and sulfur compounds provide complementary antimicrobial action through different pathways 2
Caprylic Acid Complementary antifungal effects against Candida; caprylic acid disrupts fungal cell membranes while Pau D’arco’s compounds affect multiple cellular targets 2
Berberine Enhanced antimicrobial and anti-biofilm effects; berberine’s ability to disrupt microbial efflux pumps may increase cellular retention of Pau D’arco’s active compounds 2
Grapefruit Seed Extract Complementary broad-spectrum antimicrobial effects; traditional combination in anti-Candida protocols 1
Olive Leaf Extract (Olea europaea) Enhanced antimicrobial effects; oleuropein and other compounds in olive leaf provide complementary antimicrobial action 1
Cat’s Claw (Uncaria tomentosa) Complementary immune-modulating and anti-inflammatory effects; traditional combination in South American herbal medicine 1
Turmeric (Curcuma longa) Enhanced anti-inflammatory effects through different pathways; curcuminoids complement Pau D’arco’s anti-inflammatory mechanisms 1
Piperine (Black Pepper Extract) Enhances bioavailability of Pau D’arco’s active compounds by inhibiting P-glycoprotein efflux and certain metabolic enzymes 1
Probiotics (particularly Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species) Pau D’arco reduces pathogenic microorganisms while probiotics help restore beneficial flora; complementary approach for gut health 1
Vitamin C Enhanced antioxidant effects; vitamin C may regenerate polyphenols in Pau D’arco after they neutralize free radicals 1

Antagonistic Compounds


Compound Interaction Type Evidence Rating
Anticoagulant and antiplatelet medications (e.g., warfarin, aspirin, clopidogrel) Potential additive effects on blood clotting, which could increase bleeding risk; Pau D’arco contains compounds with mild anticoagulant properties 2
Iron supplements Pau D’arco may reduce iron absorption when taken simultaneously due to binding of tannins and other compounds to iron 2
Immunosuppressant medications (e.g., cyclosporine, tacrolimus, corticosteroids) Pau D’arco’s immune-stimulating properties may potentially counteract the intended immunosuppressive action of these medications 1
Antidiabetic medications (insulin, sulfonylureas, etc.) Pau D’arco may affect blood glucose levels, potentially requiring adjustment of diabetes medication dosage 1
Chemotherapy drugs Theoretical interactions with various chemotherapy agents; should be avoided during conventional cancer treatment unless approved by oncologist 1
Medications metabolized by cytochrome P450 enzymes Pau D’arco may affect the metabolism of drugs processed by this enzyme system, potentially altering their blood levels 1
Antacids and acid-reducing medications May reduce absorption of Pau D’arco’s active compounds by altering stomach pH 1
Drugs with potential liver toxicity Theoretical concern for additive stress on liver function, though evidence is limited 1
Hormone replacement therapy Theoretical interaction based on Pau D’arco’s potential hormonal effects; clinical significance unclear 1

Cost Efficiency


Relative Cost

Low to medium

Cost Per Effective Dose

Dried inner bark: $0.20-0.50 per day; Tea bags: $0.30-0.70 per day; Capsules/tablets: $0.40-0.90 per day; Standardized extract: $0.60-1.20 per day; Tincture: $0.50-1.00 per day

Value Analysis

Pau D’arco offers moderate value for its diverse health benefits, particularly for antimicrobial and immune-supporting applications. The raw herb and basic powder forms are very cost-effective, though proper preparation (decoction rather than simple infusion) is crucial for extracting the active compounds. For Candida and fungal issues, Pau D’arco represents a moderate-value option compared to many conventional treatments. Its multiple mechanisms of action provide comprehensive benefits for addressing fungal overgrowth at a fraction of the cost of prescription antifungals, though results may develop more gradually.

The cost-effectiveness is particularly favorable for chronic, recurring conditions that would otherwise require ongoing pharmaceutical intervention. When comparing different forms, dried inner bark is the most economical option but requires more preparation time (proper decoction) and may have variable potency. Tea bags offer convenience but typically contain insufficient amounts of bark for therapeutic effects unless multiple bags are used per cup. Standardized extracts provide more consistent active compound content and potentially better quality control, justifying their moderately higher cost compared to raw herb.

Tinctures offer good value due to their long shelf life and relatively good extraction of active compounds. Organic certified products typically cost 20-30% more than conventional ones but offer better quality assurance and reduced pesticide exposure. The sustainability of Pau D’arco harvesting affects both cost and ethical considerations. Traditional harvesting involves cutting down entire trees, which is not sustainable for large-scale commercial use.

Products sourced from bark collected during sustainable timber operations (using trees already being harvested for wood) may command higher prices but represent better ecological value. When considering the versatility of Pau D’arco – its applications spanning antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, immune-modulating, and antioxidant properties – the overall value proposition is moderate to good, particularly for individuals who can benefit from multiple properties of the herb. Overall, Pau D’arco represents a moderately cost-effective natural health product, with the best value found in properly prepared decoctions of the raw herb or high-quality standardized extracts for specific therapeutic applications.

Stability Information


Shelf Life

Dried inner bark pieces: 2-3 years when properly stored; Dried inner bark powder: 1-2 years; Standardized extracts: 2-3 years; Capsules and tablets: 2-3 years when properly stored; Tinctures: 3-5 years; Tea bags: 1-2 years

Storage Recommendations

Store in airtight, opaque containers protected from light, heat, and moisture. Dried bark pieces and powder should be kept in dark glass containers or opaque packaging. Capsules and tablets should remain in their original containers with desiccant packets if provided. Tinctures should be stored in dark glass bottles with tight-fitting caps.

Avoid exposure to direct sunlight or high temperatures, which can accelerate degradation of naphthoquinones and other active compounds. Traditional South American practices recommend storing Pau D’arco in wooden or clay containers rather than plastic, though modern airtight glass containers are also suitable. Refrigeration is not necessary but can extend shelf life, particularly in hot and humid climates. For long-term storage of dried bark, traditional methods include adding a few bay leaves to prevent insect infestation.

Degradation Factors

Exposure to light, particularly UV light, accelerates degradation of naphthoquinones and other photosensitive compounds, High temperatures (above 30°C/86°F) significantly increase the rate of degradation of most active compounds, Moisture promotes hydrolysis of various compounds and increases risk of microbial growth and mycotoxin formation, Oxidation occurs gradually with air exposure, affecting naphthoquinones and other active compounds, Enzymatic degradation can occur in improperly dried plant material, Microbial contamination can lead to degradation of active compounds and production of potentially harmful metabolites, pH extremes affect stability of naphthoquinones; neutral to slightly acidic conditions are most stable, Metal ions, particularly iron and copper, can catalyze oxidation reactions, Repeated freeze-thaw cycles can disrupt cellular structures in liquid preparations, potentially affecting stability, Long-term storage gradually reduces potency even under optimal conditions due to slow oxidation and molecular rearrangement of unstable compounds

Sourcing


Synthesis Methods

  • Not synthetically produced; all commercial Pau D’arco is derived from natural plant sources
  • Lapachol and beta-lapachone (active compounds) can be synthesized in laboratories for research purposes, but this is not commercially viable for supplements
  • Standardized extracts are produced using various extraction methods including water extraction, alcohol extraction, and supercritical CO2 extraction

Natural Sources

  • Inner bark of Tabebuia impetiginosa (synonym: Handroanthus impetiginosus) trees native to the rainforests of Central and South America, particularly Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay, and Bolivia
  • Related species including Tabebuia avellanedae, Tabebuia rosea, and Tabebuia serratifolia are sometimes used, though T. impetiginosa is considered the primary medicinal species
  • Sustainable harvesting from mature trees (at least 20 years old) in managed forests
  • Cultivation projects in Brazil and other South American countries, though most commercial Pau D’arco is still wild-harvested

Quality Considerations

High-quality Pau D’arco should be sourced from the inner bark of mature Tabebuia impetiginosa trees, as the concentration of active compounds develops fully in mature trees. The inner bark (not the whole bark) contains the highest concentration of medicinal compounds. Proper species identification is crucial, as there are over 100 Tabebuia species, but only a few have significant medicinal properties. True Pau D’arco has a distinctive reddish-purple color and slightly sweet, earthy aroma. Sustainable harvesting practices are important, as traditional harvesting involves cutting down the entire tree. Look for suppliers who use bark from trees harvested for timber, ensuring the wood is also utilized. For standardized extracts, verification of naphthoquinone content (particularly lapachol and beta-lapachone) is important for efficacy. Traditional preparation methods significantly affect potency – the inner bark should be decocted (simmered) rather than simply steeped to extract the active naphthoquinones, which are not highly water-soluble. Storage conditions significantly affect potency, as many compounds in Pau D’arco are sensitive to heat, light, and moisture. Adulteration is common in the Pau D’arco market, with bark from other tree species sometimes substituted. Microscopic examination and chemical analysis can confirm authenticity. The timing of harvest may affect the concentration of active compounds, though this is less well-documented than for many other medicinal plants. Reputable suppliers should provide certificates of analysis confirming identity, potency, and purity testing, including testing for heavy metals, microbial contamination, and pesticide residues. Ethical sourcing is an important consideration, as indigenous communities in South America have traditionally used and managed these trees for centuries.

Historical Usage


Pau D’arco (Tabebuia impetiginosa) has been used for centuries by indigenous peoples of South America, particularly in Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay, and Bolivia. The name ‘Pau D’arco’ is Portuguese for ‘bow stick,’ referring to the wood’s traditional use in making hunting bows due to its exceptional hardness and durability. The medicinal use of the inner bark dates back to the Incas and other pre-Columbian civilizations, who recognized its powerful healing properties. The Guarani, Tupi, and other indigenous tribes of the Amazon basin called the tree ‘Tajy,’ meaning ‘to have strength and vigor,’ and used it for treating a wide range of conditions.

Traditional applications centered around infectious diseases, inflammatory conditions, and pain relief. Indigenous healers used Pau D’arco for treating malaria, respiratory infections, fever, snakebites, and various skin conditions. The inner bark was prepared as a decoction (simmered in water) rather than a simple infusion, as the active compounds require extended heating for proper extraction. This decoction was used both internally and externally, with topical applications for skin infections, wounds, and inflammatory skin disorders.

In traditional South American medicine, Pau D’arco was considered a ‘blood purifier’ and used for conditions believed to stem from ‘impure blood,’ including skin eruptions, boils, and systemic infections. It was also valued for its pain-relieving properties, particularly for arthritis and rheumatism. The Callawaya healers of Bolivia included Pau D’arco in their pharmacopeia for treating inflammatory conditions and infections. They combined it with other local herbs in complex formulations tailored to specific conditions.

Beyond medicinal applications, the tree held cultural significance for many indigenous groups. The beautiful pink to purple flowers made it a sacred tree in some traditions, associated with healing and spiritual protection. The wood was used not only for bows but also for construction, tool handles, and ceremonial objects due to its resistance to rot and insect damage. The modern Western interest in Pau D’arco began in the 1960s when Brazilian medical practitioners reported success using it for various serious health conditions.

While many of these claims remain scientifically unverified, they sparked research interest in the plant’s bioactive compounds. The isolation of lapachol and beta-lapachone in the 1970s led to increased scientific investigation of their potential therapeutic properties. Traditional knowledge about Pau D’arco continues to inform its contemporary use, with the inner bark still being prepared as a decoction for maximum extraction of active compounds. However, modern preparations have expanded to include standardized extracts, capsules, tinctures, and topical formulations, making this traditional remedy more accessible to global users while attempting to preserve its historical efficacy.

Scientific Evidence


Evidence Rating i

2Evidence Rating: Low Evidence – Some small studies with mixed results

Key Studies

Study Title: Antifungal activity of naphtoquinones from Tabebuia avellanedae against yeasts pathogenic to humans and phytopathogens
Authors: Jiménez-González FJ, Veloza LA, Sepúlveda-Arias JC
Publication: Biomedica
Year: 2013
Doi: 10.7705/biomedica.v33i3.1529
Url: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24652171/
Study Type: In vitro study
Population: Laboratory cultures of various Candida species and other fungi
Findings: Naphthoquinones isolated from Tabebuia avellanedae demonstrated significant antifungal activity against various Candida species, with minimum inhibitory concentrations comparable to some conventional antifungals
Limitations: In vitro study, may not reflect in vivo efficacy

Study Title: Anti-inflammatory activity of Tabebuia avellanedae extracts and constituents
Authors: Byeon SE, Chung JY, Lee YG, Kim BH, Kim KH, Cho JY
Publication: Immunopharmacology and Immunotoxicology
Year: 2008
Doi: 10.1080/08923970802135690
Url: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18686104/
Study Type: In vitro and ex vivo study
Population: Macrophage cell lines and mouse peritoneal macrophages
Findings: Extracts and isolated compounds from Tabebuia avellanedae significantly inhibited inflammatory mediators including nitric oxide, prostaglandin E2, and pro-inflammatory cytokines
Limitations: Primarily cell-based study, limited in vivo confirmation

Study Title: Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of crude extracts and fractions of cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.), cajui (Anacardium microcarpum), and Pau D’arco (Tabebuia impetiginosa W.)
Authors: Melo Cavalcante AA, Rubensam G, Picada JN, da Silva EG, Moreira JC, Henriques JA
Publication: Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Year: 2003
Doi: 10.1021/jf021083w
Url: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12696944/
Study Type: In vitro study
Population: Cell-free systems and bacterial cultures
Findings: Pau D’arco extracts demonstrated significant antioxidant activity and antimicrobial effects against various bacterial strains
Limitations: In vitro study, may not reflect in vivo efficacy

Study Title: Immunomodulatory activity of Tabebuia avellanedae extracts on human peripheral blood mononuclear cells
Authors: Böhler T, Nolting J, Gurragchaa P, Lupescu A, Neumayer HH, Budde K, Waiser J
Publication: Journal of Ethnopharmacology
Year: 2008
Doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2008.07.019
Url: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18721871/
Study Type: Ex vivo study
Population: Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells
Findings: Tabebuia avellanedae extracts modulated immune cell function, with differential effects on various immune cell subsets and cytokine production
Limitations: Ex vivo study, may not directly translate to in vivo effects

Study Title: Beta-lapachone, a naphthoquinone derivative isolated from Tabebuia avellanedae, induces apoptosis in HepG2 hepatoma cells
Authors: Woo HJ, Choi YH
Publication: Journal of Medicinal Food
Year: 2005
Doi: 10.1089/jmf.2005.8.454
Url: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16379563/
Study Type: In vitro study
Population: Human hepatoma cell line (HepG2)
Findings: Beta-lapachone isolated from Tabebuia avellanedae induced apoptosis in hepatoma cells through multiple mechanisms
Limitations: In vitro study using isolated compound rather than whole herb extract

Meta Analyses

No comprehensive meta-analyses specifically focused on Pau D’arco have been published to date.

Ongoing Trials

Investigation of Tabebuia avellanedae extracts for oral candidiasis (Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry: RBR-3hx6gn), Evaluation of topical Pau D’arco preparations for dermatological conditions (Clinical Trials Registry India: CTRI/2019/06/019876), Preliminary assessment of Tabebuia extract as adjunctive therapy in inflammatory bowel conditions (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04267523)

Disclaimer: The information provided is for educational purposes only and is not intended as medical advice. Always consult with a healthcare professional before starting any supplement regimen, especially if you have pre-existing health conditions or are taking medications.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top